Date/Time: November 6, 2026 | 1:00 – 2:00 pm

Room: TAHOMA 2

Abstract: As school systems rethink traditional instructional models, educators are increasingly examining how the design of physical learning environments influences engagement, collaboration, and academic outcomes. Research suggests that the structure of learning spaces is not simply aesthetic; it is a strategic factor that can shape instructional practices and expand time available for learning.

A comparative case study of kindergarten learning environments demonstrated that pod-based designs significantly reduced transition times between classrooms and activity programs. Researchers found that this model recaptured the equivalent of approximately seven additional days of learning time compared to traditional campus layouts.

Additional research on flexible classroom environments has shown that learning spaces designed to support interaction, mobility, and technological connectivity significantly increase student engagement and student–teacher interaction. Studies of innovative learning environments also reveal that flexible student groupings within adaptable spaces contribute to higher levels of student interaction and more positive classroom emotional climates.

This presentation introduces the SPACE Framework—Structure with Flexibility, Purpose‑Driven Design, Agency & Autonomy, Cognitive Engagement, and Evidence of Impact—to help school leaders connect learning environment design with instructional strategy and measurable student outcomes.

Learning Objectives:

1. Analyze how physical learning environments influence student engagement, instructional interaction, and time available for learning, as well as the health, safety, and welfare of students and educators.
2. Apply the SPACE Framework to evaluate and redesign learning environments that support active learning and collaboration.Participants will explore how the five components of the SPACE Framework—Structure with Flexibility, Purpose-Driven Design, Agency & Autonomy, Cognitive Engagement, and Evidence of Impact—can guide intentional learning space design and improve supervision, circulation, and access to instructional support.
3. Identify practical strategies school leaders can use to implement flexible and purpose-driven learning environments. Participants will review real implementation approaches such as learning zones, push-in instructional models, flexible student grouping, and collaborative learning spaces.
4. Develop a plan to measure the impact of learning environment redesign on student engagement and academic outcomes, and the impact of learning space. Design through post occupancy evaluation and performance data.